![]() Comptes rendus de l’académie des sciences de Paris 147, 131–134. Pressions osmotiques et mouvement brownien. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 72, 69–73. The Brownian Movement and Stochastic Equations. The British Journal for the History of Science 26, 233–234. The case of Brownian motion: a note on Bachelier’s contribution. Atoms, Mechanics, and Probability: Ludwig Boltzmann’s Statistico-Mechanical Writings - An Exegesis. Comptes rendus de l’académie des sciences de Paris 147, 1044–1046. ![]() Le mouvement Brownien et la formule d’Einstein. Annales scientifiques de l’École normale supérieure 17, 21–86. We show how Brownian motion became a research topic for the mathematician Wiener in the 1920s, why his model was an idealization of physical experiments, what Ornstein and Uhlenbeck added to Einstein’s results, and how Wiener, Ornstein and Uhlenbeck developed in parallel contradictory theories concerning Brownian velocity. We study the works of Einstein, Smoluchowski, Langevin, Wiener, Ornstein and Uhlenbeck from 1905 to 1934 as well as experimental results, using the concept of Brownian velocity as a leading thread. In this article, we tackle the period straddling the two ‘half-histories’ just mentioned, in order to highlight continuity, to investigate the domain-shift from physics to mathematics, and to survey the enhancements of later physical theories. There is no published work telling its entire history from its discovery until today, but rather partial histories either from 1827 to Perrin’s experiments in the late 1900s, from a physicist’s point of view or from the 1920s from a mathematician’s point of view. Consequently, Brownian motion now refers to the natural phenomenon but also to the theories accounting for it. If millions of these tiny circuits could be built on a 1-millimeter by 1-millimeter chip, they could serve as a low- power battery replacement.Interest in Brownian motion was shared by different communities: this phenomenon was first observed by the botanist Robert Brown in 1827, then theorised by physicists in the 1900s, and eventually modelled by mathematicians from the 1920s, while still evolving as a physical theory. The team's next objective is to determine if the DC current can be stored in a capacitor for later use, a goal that requires miniaturizing the circuit and patterning it on a silicon wafer, or chip. "What we did was reroute the current in the circuit and transform it into something useful." ![]() In fact, if no current was flowing, the resistor would cool down," Thibado explained. "People may think that current flowing in a resistor causes it to heat up, but the Brownian current does not. The team also discovered that the relatively slow motion of graphene induces current in the circuit at low frequencies, which is important from a technological perspective because electronics function more efficiently at lower frequencies. ![]() "This means that the second law of thermodynamics is not violated, nor is there any need to argue that 'Maxwell's Demon' is separating hot and cold electrons," Thibado said. ![]() That's an important distinction, said Thibado, because a temperature difference between the graphene and circuit, in a circuit producing power, would contradict the second law of thermodynamics. Though the thermal environment is performing work on the load resistor, the graphene and circuit are at the same temperature and heat does not flow between the two. With the diodes in opposition allowing the current to flow both ways, they provide separate paths through the circuit, producing a pulsing DC current that performs work on a load resistor.Īccording to Kumar, the graphene and circuit share a symbiotic relationship. Knowing this, Thibado's group built their circuit with two diodes for converting AC into a direct current (DC). In the 1950s, physicist Léon Brillouin published a landmark paper refuting the idea that adding a single diode, a one-way electrical gate, to a circuit is the solution to harvesting energy from Brownian motion. Thibado's team found that at room temperature the thermal motion of graphene does in fact induce an alternating current (AC) in a circuit, an achievement thought to be impossible. The idea of harvesting energy from graphene is controversial because it refutes physicist Richard Feynman's well-known assertion that the thermal motion of atoms, known as Brownian motion, cannot do work. The findings, published in the journal Physical Review E, are proof of a theory the physicists developed at the U of A three years ago that freestanding graphene-a single layer of carbon atoms-ripples and buckles in a way that holds promise for energy harvesting. "An energy-harvesting circuit based on graphene could be incorporated into a chip to provide clean, limitless, low-voltage power for small devices or sensors," said Paul Thibado, professor of physics and lead researcher in the discovery. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |